Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alison Van Uytvanck vs Linda Noskova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Uytvanck vs Noskova analysis and find out who is favored!
Alison Van Uytvanck vs Linda Noskova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Uytvanck 1 - 0 Noskova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Uytvanck has won 48.02% of points on their second serve, while Noskova has won 47.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Uytvanck, in recent form, has won 55.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Noskova has won 51.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.02% and 34.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Uytvanck has saved 58.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Noskova has saved 58.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Uytvanck has won 69.23% of matches played (W/L 18/ 8), with Noskova winning 62.96% (W/L 34/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Uytvanck has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 142/ 61), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 103/ 98). Noskova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 78% (W/L 43/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Uytvanck has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72% of matches (W/L 18/ 7), where as Noskova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 15/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Uytvanck winning 1 times and Noskova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Uytvanck winning 2 and Noskova winning 0. The last match between Uytvanck and Noskova was at the Upper Austria Ladies Linz - Linz, 07-02-2023, First, I.hard with Alison Van Uytvanck getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Uytvanck and Noskova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Uytvanck winning 0 times and Noskova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Uytvanck winning 1, and Noskova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Uytvanck has played against opponents with an average rank of 282.65 while Noskova has played against players with an average rank of 114.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Uytvanck has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Noskova has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Uytvanck has converted 43.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Noskova has converted 43.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
397
Rank
37
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
29
Rank
28
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
60% (397-265)
Career Total W/L
67% (136-66)
65% (13-7)
YTD W/L
63% (17-10)
$2,102,898
Career Prize Money
$1,665,160
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Alison Van Uytvanck | Linda Noskova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:35 | 1:36:35 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (46/75) | 62% (53/86) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (32/46) | 47% (25/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 31% (9/29) | 45% (15/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (46/86) | 45% (34/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats 
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alison Van Uytvanck | Linda Noskova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (13/7) | 63% (17/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (28/19) | 59% (38/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (231/205) | 51% (315/305) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 70% (14/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 63 | 124 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 113 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:27 | 1:40:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 281.35 | 91.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (812/1393) | 61% (1218/2003) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (555/812) | 68% (834/1218) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (279/581) | 47% (370/785) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (74/170) | 44% (86/196) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (619/1432) | 41% (815/1999) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 71% (5/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 89% (8/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 78% (18/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 22% (18/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 33% (9/3) |
Alison Van Uytvanck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
3
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Anastasiya Soboleva
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-7(4) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Sada Nahimana
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Malene Helgo
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Gloria Ceschi
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Viola Turini
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Linda Noskova
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Harriet Dart
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Linda Noskova
42%
(
30 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
73 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Maria Timofeeva
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Uytvanck Vs Noskova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
